Skip to main content
Head to head

Dexcom Stelo vs Oura Ring Gen 4

Two devices, the same questions: what does it actually measure, how good is the data, what does it cost to keep using, and who is it for.

Dexcom · Continuous Glucose Monitor

Dexcom Stelo

9.2/ 10

The first over-the-counter continuous glucose monitor in the US. A 15-day skin-worn sensor that turns a black-box variable — your glucose response to food, stress and sleep — into a graph you can act on.

Full review →
Oura · Smart Ring

Oura Ring Gen 4

9.4/ 10Higher score

The best-in-class passive sleep and HRV tracker. A titanium ring you forget you're wearing that produces some of the most defensible sleep-stage and readiness data on the consumer market.

Full review →
Specification comparison of Dexcom Stelo and Oura Ring Gen 4
SpecDexcom SteloOura Ring Gen 4
PriceNot sold in the UK — Abbott Lingo is the equivalent here, around £120/monthAround £350, plus roughly £6/month membership
SubscriptionNone (device is single-use)Required after 1-month trial for full metrics
Form factorSkin-worn sensor, upper arm, 15 days per sensorTitanium ring, 7 sizes
Battery lifeSensor lifespan 15 days7 days
Water resistanceYes (shower/swim)100 m
PlatformsiOS, Android Same
Sensors
  • Interstitial fluid glucose electrode (enzymatic)
  • Bluetooth Low Energy transmitter
  • Red & infrared PPG (heart rate, HRV, SpO₂)
  • NTC skin temperature sensor (0.13 °C resolution)
  • 3-axis accelerometer
  • Signal-processing chip (Gen 4 sensor array upgraded from Gen 3)
Metrics tracked
  • Continuous glucose every 15 minutes
  • Time-in-range 70–140 mg/dL
  • Glucose spike & AUC per meal
  • Overnight glucose stability
  • Glycaemic variability (CV%)
  • Sleep stages (light, deep, REM) & sleep latency
  • Nightly HRV, resting heart rate, respiratory rate
  • Skin temperature deviation from personal baseline
  • Blood oxygen (SpO₂) trend during sleep
  • Daytime stress and steps, cardio load
  • Menstrual cycle prediction from temperature
Data qualityMARD (mean absolute relative difference) in the ~10% range vs venous blood glucose — best-in-class for consumer CGM. Interstitial lag makes rapid spikes appear ~5 minutes late.Sleep-stage agreement with polysomnography is in the 79–80% range for prior generations — better than most wrist wearables. HRV and RHR trends are highly reliable when compared over weeks. Absolute values are calibrated to personal baselines, so cross-device comparisons are less meaningful than trend.
EcosystemNative Stelo app; data export to Apple Health and Google Health Connect. Third-party integrations via Dexcom API and platforms like Levels, Nutrisense and Signos.Native app on iOS and Android. Exports to Apple Health and Google Health Connect. Third-party integrations via Zapier and the Oura API for developers.
PrivacyGlucose data stored in Dexcom cloud; can be exported as CSV. HIPAA-aligned handling.Data stored on Oura servers with pseudonymised IDs; GDPR/HIPAA options available. Users can request full data export and account deletion.

Dexcom Stelo

Strengths
  • Otc — no prescription needed for non-diabetics in the US
  • 15-day wear, waterproof, minimally invasive
  • Turns diet and exercise into an immediate feedback loop
  • Best-in-class sensor accuracy in the CGM space
Weaknesses
  • Not intended for insulin-dependent diabetics (see G7 for that)
  • 15-minute readings vs 1-minute on G7 — smoother, less real-time
  • Interstitial fluid lags blood glucose by 5–10 minutes
Best for
  • Metabolic-optimisation users identifying personal glycaemic responses
  • Anyone with pre-diabetes or a family history of type 2 diabetes
  • People chasing zone-2 fitness or GLP-1 protocol optimisation
Not for
  • Type 1 diabetics needing dosing decisions from the device
  • Users unwilling to wear a visible sensor on the arm

Oura Ring Gen 4

Strengths
  • Sleep-stage classification validated against polysomnography with reasonable agreement
  • Passive, comfortable form factor — high adherence over months
  • Excellent HRV trend data and readiness scoring
  • Long-term temperature baseline detects illness onset early
Weaknesses
  • Membership is mandatory for full data — the ring alone is limited
  • Poor for high-intensity exercise tracking (no GPS, no chest-strap accuracy)
  • Screen-free — you must open the app to see anything
Best for
  • Anyone whose primary goal is sleep and recovery optimisation
  • Users who dislike wrist wearables or want a discreet device
  • Longevity tracking of resting HR and HRV trends over months to years
Not for
  • Serious endurance athletes needing real-time pace/GPS
  • People unwilling to pay a monthly subscription
Verdict — Dexcom Stelo

The lowest-friction way to turn glucose into an actionable metric. Non-diabetics should treat it as a 15–30 day learning tool, not a permanent wear.

Verdict — Oura Ring Gen 4

If sleep and recovery are the metrics you care about most and you'll wear the device consistently, the Gen 4 remains the benchmark. Skip it only if you refuse subscriptions or need one device to also do serious training analytics.

Other comparisons

Scores reflect our own testing criteria — data quality, what the device measures that matters for healthspan, and total cost of ownership including subscription. Prices are manufacturer list prices and change often; check before buying. Some links are affiliate links, which never affect a score — see our affiliate disclosure.